Item Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Journal of Personality AssessmentPublished 1 June 1984
Oliver C. S. Tzeng, Dennis Outcalt, Sara L. Boyer, Roger Ware, Dan Landis
Citations95
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.29
SNIP1.52
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The present study presents a brief summary of four extensive psychometric analyses of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) items. Positive empirical evidence supports the MBTI item validity. However, several measurement issues on item construction were raised to caution the future users.
Keywords
PsychologyComputer Science
Journal of Personality AssessmentAn Assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
272 Citations1977Marcia Carlyn
Results of the studies indicate that the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is an adequately reliable self-report inventory, measuring dimensions of personality which seem to be quite similar to those postulated by Carl Jung.
Educational and Psychological MeasurementA Comparative Evaluation of Four Response Formats in Personality Ratings
12 Citations1983Oliver C. S. Tzeng
Journal of PersonalityImplicit Personality Theory: Myth or fact? An illustration of how empirical research can miss
12 Citations1982Oliver C. S. Tzeng, Chun-Hung Tzeng
Journal of PersonalityThe artificial dispute over Implicit Personality Theory: An answer to Jackson, Strieker, and Mirels
5 Citations1982Oliver C. S. Tzeng