Is Reliability Obsolete? A Commentary on "Are Simple Gain Scores Obsolete?"
Applied Psychological MeasurementPublished 1 September 1996Open access
Linda M. Collins
Citations69
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Williams & Zimmerman (1996) provided much- needed clarification on the reliability of gain scores. This commentary translates these ideas into recogniz able patterns of change that tend to produce reliable or unreliable gain scores. It also questions the relevance of the traditional idea of reliability to the measurement of change. Index terms: change scores, classical test theory, difference scores, gain scores, intraindividual differences, measurement of growth, reliability, test theory, validity.
Keywords
PsychologySocial SciencesDecision Sciences
Psychological BulletinHow we should measure "change": Or should we?
2,496 Citations1970Lee J. Cronbach, Lita Furby
Psychological BulletinUsing covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time.
892 Citations1994John B. Willett, Aline G. Sayer
Applied Psychological MeasurementAre Simple Gain Scores Obsolete?
195 Citations1996Richard H. Williams, Donald W. Zimmerman
