Do liberal cities limit new housing development? Evidence from California
Journal of Urban EconomicsPublished 22 October 2010
Matthew E. Kahn
Citations92
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score3.85
SNIP2.75
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Traditional explanations for why some communities block new housing construction focus on incumbent home owner incentives to block entry. Local resident political ideology may also influence community permitting decisions. This paper uses city level panel data across California metropolitan areas from 2000 to 2008 to document that liberal cities grant fewer new housing permits than observationally similar cities located within the same metropolitan area. Cities experiencing a growth in their liberal voter share have a lower new housing permit growth rate.
Keywords
Social SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsThe Geographic Determinants of Housing Supply<sup>*</sup>
1,981 Citations2010Albert Sáiz
The Journal of Law and EconomicsWhy Is Manhattan So Expensive? Regulation and the Rise in Housing Prices
638 Citations2005Edward L. Glaeser, Joseph Gyourko +1 more
Choice Reviews OnlineThe homevoter hypothesis: how home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies
593 Citations2002
Journal of Urban EconomicsThe causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston
571 Citations2008Edward L. Glaeser, Bryce Ward
Regional Science and Urban EconomicsLand use regulation and new construction
450 Citations2000Christopher J. Mayer, C. Tsuriel Somerville
American Economic ReviewRegulation and the High Cost of Housing in California
441 Citations2005John M. Quigley, Steven Raphael
Journal of Urban EconomicsTesting for Strategic Interaction Among Local Governments: The Case of Growth Controls
390 Citations1998Jan K. Brueckner
Urban StudiesAn Economic History of Zoning and a Cure for its Exclusionary Effects
293 Citations2004William A. Fischel
Journal of Environmental Economics and ManagementExplaining the appearance and success of voter referenda for open-space conservation
136 Citations2006Matthew J. Kotchen, Shawn Powers
Journal of Urban EconomicsLandscape preferences and patterns of residential development
114 Citations2004Matthew A. Turner
Journal of Urban Planning and DevelopmentGovernance and Opportunity in Metropolitan America
89 Citations2000Frank L. Kudrna
American Journal of Political ScienceDevelopment Ballot Measures, Interest Group Endorsements, and the Political Geography of Growth Preferences
81 Citations2003Elisabeth R. Gerber, Justin Phillips
Economics and PoliticsVOTING ON GROWTH CONTROL MEASURES: PREFERENCES AND STRATEGIES*
66 Citations1992Jeffrey A. Dubin, D. Roderick Kiewiet +1 more
Regulations and Housing Development: What We Know
41 Citations2005Michael H. Schill
