Cultural competence in evaluation: An overview
New Directions for EvaluationPublished 1 June 2004
Saumitra SenGupta, Rodney Hopson, Melva Thompson‐Robinson
Citations138
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.48
SNIP0.66
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
This chapter is an overview of the understanding of cultural competence and context in evaluation, highlighting how other disciplines have addressed the importance of culture and suggesting the value‐addedness of culture to program evaluation and design.
Abstract
Abstract This chapter is an overview of the understanding of cultural competence and context in evaluation, highlighting how other disciplines have addressed the importance of culture and suggesting the value‐addedness of culture to program evaluation and design.
Keywords
PsychologyDecision Sciences
The Truly Disadvantaged
2,446 Citations2018William Julius Wilson
Personality and Social Psychology BulletinThe Ultimate Attribution Error: Extending Allport's Cognitive Analysis of Prejudice
1,187 Citations1979Thomas F. Pettigrew
American Sociological ReviewThe Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science.
1,164 Citations1965Ernest Nagel, Abraham Kaplan
Annual Review of PsychologyCulture, Mind, and the Brain: Current Evidence and Future Directions
711 Citations2010Shinobu Kitayama, Ayşe K. Üskül
A new model of neuro-culture interaction is proposed here, hypothesizing that the brain serves as a crucial site that accumulates effects of cultural experience, insofar as neural connectivity is likely modified through sustained engagement in cultural practices.
Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooksThe CIPP Model for Evaluation
405 Citations2005Daniel L. Stufflebeam
Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooksProgram Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation
381 Citations2005Robert E. Stake
The 2002 user friendly handbook for project evaluation.
309 Citations2002Joy A. Frechtling, Henry T. Frierson +3 more
The CIPP Model for Evaluation
233 Citations2003Daniel L. Stufflebeam
New Directions for EvaluationDeliberative democratic evaluation
210 Citations2000Ernest R. House, Kenneth R. Howe
Judging evaluations on the basis of their potential for democratic deliberation includes consideration of three interrelated criteria: inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation.
American Journal of EvaluationInclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation
183 Citations1999Donna M. Mertens
American Journal of EvaluationInclusive Evaluation: Implications of Transformative Theory for Evaluation
173 Citations1999Donna M. Mertens
American PsychologistRace–ethnicity and measured intelligence: Educational implications.
133 Citations1997Lisa A. Suzuki, Richard R. Valencia
New Directions for EvaluationChallenges in practicing deliberative democratic evaluation
103 Citations2000Jennifer C. Greene
Evaluation PracticeSeeking multicultural validity: A postcard from the road
86 Citations1995Karen E. Kirkhart
New Directions for EvaluationNobody knows my name: In praise of african american evaluators who were responsive
78 Citations2001Stafford Hood
Counseling Persons of African Descent: Raising the Bar of Practitioner Competence
65 Citations2002Thomas A. Parham
New Directions for EvaluationBecoming responsive—and some consequences for evaluation as dialogue across distance
37 Citations2001Yoland Wadsworth
New Directions for Program EvaluationPrimary inclusion of culturally diverse minority program participants in the evaluation process
30 Citations1992Anna‐Marie Madison
Ethnic and racial minorities have the most at stake in the evaluation of social services and educational programs, yet advocates of the participation of multiple stakeholders in evaluation seldom include minority participants in the process.
New Directions for Program EvaluationThe challenge of cross‐cultural evaluation: Some views from the field
26 Citations1985Merry M. Merryfield
New Directions for EvaluationLanguage in defining social problems and in evaluating social programs
24 Citations2000Anna Madison
New Directions for EvaluationHIV/AIDS talk: Implications for prevention intervention and evaluation
21 Citations2000Rodney Hopson, Kenya J. Lucas +1 more
New Directions for EvaluationEthical issues in conducting evaluation in international settings
19 Citations1999Michael Bamberger
American Journal of EvaluationMinority Issues in Evaluation Revisited: Re-Conceptualizing and Creating Opportunities for Institutional Change
17 Citations1999Rodney Hopson
Evaluation and Program PlanningEvaluation in cross-cultural perspective
13 Citations1988Pauline E. Ginsberg
New Directions for Program EvaluationCross‐cultural nongeneralizations
11 Citations1985Michael Quinn Patton
New Directions for Program EvaluationInternational and domestic evaluation: Comparisons and insights
10 Citations1985Ross F. Conner
American Journal of EvaluationMinority issues in evaluation revisited: re-conceptualizing and creating opportunities for institutional change
10 Citations1999Rodney Hopson