login

Prospective audit of discharge summary errors

British journal of surgeryPublished 1 June 1996Open access
Ewan Macaulay, G G Cooper, J Engeset, A. Ross Naylor
Citations57
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.69
SNIP1.79
View PDF

TL;DR

This study suggests that verification of the accuracy of clinical and management data should be an essential component of departmental audit meetings.

Abstract

During an 8-month interval of prospective audit, 63 of 637 (10 per cent) vascular discharge summaries were found to contain 94 errors. These comprised 11 (12 per cent) general errors, 21 (22 per cent) diagnostic errors, 19 (20 per cent) operative data errors, 19 (20 per cent) cases of incorrect clinical text information, 14 (15 per cent) missed complications and 10 (11 per cent) concerning follow-up arrangements. Overall, 2 per cent of consultant discharge summaries contained errors compared with 7 per cent for the senior registrar, 10 per cent for registrars and 17 per cent for senior house officers. Given that the majority of discharge summaries are currently prepared by junior staff, this study suggests that verification of the accuracy of clinical and management data should be an essential component of departmental audit meetings.

Keywords

MedicineHealth Professions