Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism
The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsPublished 1 February 2001
James Andreoni, Lise Vesterlund
Citations1,437
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score35.99
SNIP9.32
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
We study gender differences in altruism by examining a modified dictator game with varying incomes and prices. Our results indicate that the question “which is the fair sex?” has a complicated answer—when altruism is expensive, women are kinder, but when it is cheap, men are more altruistic. That is, we find that the male and female “demand curves for altruism” cross, and that men are more responsive to price changes. Furthermore, men are more likely to be either perfectly selfish or perfectly selfless, whereas women tend to be “equalitarians” who prefer to share evenly.
Keywords
Social Sciences
Games and Economic BehaviorFairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments
2,396 Citations1994Robert Forsythe, Joël L. Horowitz +2 more
Journal of Economic PsychologyGender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis
1,329 Citations1997Melanie Powell, David Ansic
The Economic JournalAre Women Less Selfish Than Men?: Evidence From Dictator Experiments
1,028 Citations1998Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman
Journal of Public EconomicsGroup size and the voluntary provision of public goods
745 Citations1994R. Mark Isaac, James M. Walker +1 more
American Economic ReviewGender and Culture: International Experimental Evidence from Trust Games
635 Citations1999Rachel Croson, Nancy R. Buchan
American Economic ReviewSocial Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Comment
520 Citations1999Iris Bohnet, Bruno S. Frey
Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationThe sound of silence in prisoner's dilemma and dictator games
492 Citations1999Iris Bohnet, Bruno S. Frey
International Journal of Game TheoryDictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness
481 Citations1998Gary E. Bolton, Elena Katok +1 more
A hypothetical decision procedure is proposed, based on the notion that dictator giving originates with personal and social rules that effectively constrain self-interested behavior, that provides a link between dictator behavior and a broader class of laboratory phenomena.
American Economic ReviewAn Experimental Test Of The Public Goods Crowding-Out Hypothesis
420 Citations1993James Andreoni
Medical Entomology and ZoologyRisk Taking: A Study in Cognition and Personality
363 Citations1983Nathan Kogan, Michael A. Wallach
The Journal of PsychologyThe Interaction of Experiential and Situational Factors and Gender in a Simulated Risky Decision-Making Task
306 Citations1988Irwin P. Levin, Mary A. Snyder +1 more
Economics LettersAn experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior
290 Citations1995Gary E. Bolton, Elena Katok
Games and Economic BehaviorGames and economic behavior
267 Citations1989Ehud Kalai
Deterministic and randomized strategyproof mechanisms that achieve a good approximation of the optimal social welfare are designed, and complement these with nearly-tight impossibility results.
Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationGender effects in laboratory public goods contribution
256 Citations1993Jamie Brown-Kruse, David Hummels
The Economic JournalA Laboratory Study of Group Polarisation in the Team Dictator Game
249 Citations1997Timothy N. Cason, Vai‐Lam Mui
The Journal of Human ResourcesCharitable Giving by Married Couples
221 Citations2003James Andreoni, Eleanor Brown +1 more
The Journal of Human ResourcesCharitable Giving by Married Couples: Who Decides and Why Does It Matter?
204 Citations2003James Andreoni, Eleanor Brown +1 more
Psychological ReportsRisk-Taking: A Motivational Basis for Sex Differences
144 Citations1993Elizabeth C. Arch
The Journal of PsychologySex Differences in Risk Taking: Repeated Sessions on a Computer-Simulated Task
121 Citations1985Gerald A. Hudgens, Linda T. Fatkin
The Journal of Social PsychologyCultural and Gender Differences in Risk-Taking Behavior among American and Spanish Decision Makers
118 Citations1991George M. Zinkhan, Kiran Karande
SSRN Electronic JournalDifferences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence
101 Citations2008Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman
RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsGiving according to GARP: an experimental test of the rationality of altruism
45 Citations1999James Andreoni, J. Houston Miller
RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsPlaying it Safe: Men, Women, and Risk Aversion
9 Citations1997Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman +2 more
New Directions for Philanthropic FundraisingWomen giving money, women raising money: What difference for philanthropy?
4 Citations1995Susan A. Ostrander, Joan M. Fisher
