Issues in using multiple measures of quality of life

Seminars in Oncology NursingPublished 1 November 1990

Anne Jalowiec

DOI10.1016/0749-2081(90)90029-5

Source URL

Citations45

SJR quartileQ2

SJR score0.65

SNIP0.77

TL;DR

Assessment of quality of life requires a multifaceted approach in order to evaluate the impact of an illness, treatment, or intervention onquality of life.

Abstract

Assessment of quality of life requires a multifaceted approach in order to evaluate the impact of an illness, treatment, or intervention on quality of life. The use of several measures offers notable advantages over unidimensional and global assessment techniques. Disadvantages of multiple measures also exist, but these problems can be circumvented with adequate knowledge and careful planning.

Keywords

MedicineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance

Using multivariate statistics

77,462 Citations1983Barbara G. Tabachnick, Linda S. Fidell

In this Section: 1. Multivariate Statistics: Why? and 2. A Guide to Statistical Techniques: Using the Book Research Questions and Associated Techniques.

Computers Environment and Urban SystemsStatistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences

65,645 Citations1990

Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires

4,234 Citations1987Ian McDowell, Claire Newell

The theory and the leading methods of measurement, all of which rely on subjective judgments in questionnaires and rating scales are described, showing readers how to select the most suitable one, apply it, and score the results.

Journal of Chronic DiseasesStandards for validating health measures: Definition and content

643 Citations1987John E. Ware

The dimensionality of health and the range of health states that can be measured within each dimension are discussed and it is recommended that labels be assigned to health measures in a manner consistent with their content and other evidence of validity.

PubMedMeasuring quality of life today: methodological aspects.

534 Citations1990Cella Df, David S. Tulsky

A table that reviews many available quality of life measures that have been designed for, or frequently used with, people with cancer is reviewed.

Choice Reviews OnlineHandbook of family measurement techniques

421 Citations1990

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteQuality of Life End Points in Cancer Clinical Trials: Review and Recommendations

382 Citations1989Carol M. Moinpour, Polly Feigl +4 more

Policy issues that influenced the development of policies for inclusion of quality of life end points in certain Southwest Oncology Group clinical trials are reviewed and specific questionnaires with psychometric properties are recommended.

Social Science & MedicineThe quality of life of cancer patients: A review of the literature

367 Citations1985J.C.J.M. de Haes, F. C. E. van Knippenberg

An overview of the results of studies into the quality of life (QL) of cancer patients is given and it is suggested that psychological mechanisms may account for the absence of differences between cancer patients and others and may explain the established inconsistencies.

PubMedQuality of life: what is it? How should it be measured?

346 Citations1988Neil K Aaronson

The major challenge is to develop measures of the various dimensions of quality of life that, while meeting rigorous standards of validity and reliability, also reflect an appreciation of the practical constraints typically operating in clinical research settings.

OncologyQuality-of-Life of Cancer Patients

215 Citations2009Richard J. Lanham, Anthony F. DiGiannantonio

During March and April 1986 a study of the quality-of-life of cancer patients was done in a medical school-affiliated community hospital in the Midwest, USA, and in general, women in the experimental group did not differ significantly from women inthe control group, while men related that they were doing more poorly than did men in the control group and women inThe experimental arm.