Transaction cost economics
Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationPublished 1 December 1987
Oliver E. Williamson
Citations215
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.44
SNIP1.31
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Gregory Dow's assessment of transaction cost economics is both thoughtful and provocative. Although we agree on many matters, these remarks focus on our differences. I begin with a brief sketch of the framework out of which transaction cost economics operates. I then examine the purported bias of transaction cost economics in favor of capital managed as against labor managed firms and my alleged failure to deal with 'downward opportunism'. Dow's claim that transaction cost economics is given to functionalist excesses is considered next. Concluding remarks follow.
Keywords
Social SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
American Journal of SociologyEconomic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness
28,211 Citations1985Mark Granovetter
Journal of Economic IssuesThe Economic Institutions of Capitalism
14,988 Citations1987William M. Dugger
Macat Library eBooksThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions
5,423 Citations2017Jo Hedesan, Joseph Tendler
Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationThe function of authority in transaction cost economics
294 Citations1987Gregory K. Dow
Industries, Firms, and Jobs
77 Citations1988
The Bell Journal of EconomicsObligational Markets and the Mechanics of Inflation
69 Citations1978Michael L. Wachter, Oliver E. Williamson
Journal of Economic Behavior & OrganizationEmployee ownership and internal governance
63 Citations1985R. Robert Russell
