Effects of Sophistication and Faking Sets on the Eysenck Personality Inventory
Psychological ReportsPublished 1 August 1975
Wayne F. Velicer, Barbara J. Weiner
Citations31
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.76
SNIP0.91
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Personality inventories, by their very nature, are particularly susceptible to faking. Past studies have shown that instructions to fake can distort responses to a personality inventory; however, validity scales have generally detected faking. Such studies have generally assumed that Ss were naive. When the effects of different faking sets with Ss of different degrees of sophistication were investigated using the Eysenck Personality Inventory the results indicate that Ss possessing even a minimum degree of sophistication can successfully fake on this inventory.
Keywords
Psychology
Psychological ReportsEffects of Faking Instructions on the Eysenck Personality Inventory
41 Citations1966John R. Braun, Barbara J. Gomez
Effects of two faking instructions on Eysenck Personality Inventory scores were investigated and the “attempt-to-conceal-faking” instruction produced significantly smaller increases in Lie but at the expense of a significantly smaller decrease in Neuroticism.
Psychological ReportsEffects of “Salesman Candidate” Sets on the Eysenck Personality Inventory
17 Citations1967Barbara J. Gomez, John R. Braun
L scores were again shown to be of value in detecting faking but not to so great an extent as in the original srudy.
