login

Evaluating Content Selection in Summarization: The Pyramid Method

Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)Published 1 January 2004Open access
Ani Nenkova, Rebecca J. Passonneau
Citations537
View PDF

TL;DR

It is argued that the method presented is reliable, predictive and diagnostic, thus improves considerably over the shortcomings of the human evaluation method currently used in the Document Understanding Conference.

Abstract

We present an empirically grounded method for evaluating content selection in summarization. It incorporates the idea that no single best model summary for a collection of documents exists. Our method quantifies the relative importance of facts to be conveyed. We argue that it is reliable, predictive and diagnostic, thus improves considerably over the shortcomings of the human evaluation method currently used in the Document Understanding Conference.

Keywords

Computer Science