Errors of Measurement and Standard Setting in Mastery Testing
Applied Psychological MeasurementPublished 1 January 1984Open access
Michael T. Kane, Jennifer L. Wilson
Citations45
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
A number of studies have estimated the dependabil ity of domain-referenced mastery tests for a fixed cut off score. Other studies have estimated the dependa bility of judgments about the cutoff score. Each of these two types of dependability introduces error. Brennan and Lockwood (1980) analyzed the two kinds of errors together but assumed that the two sources of error were uncorrelated. This paper extends that analy sis of the total error in estimates of the difference be tween the domain score and the cutoff score to allow for covariance between the two types of error.
Keywords
Decision Sciences
Educational ResearcherEssentials of Educational Measurement
1,493 Citations1980Alfred D. Garvin, Robert L. Ebel
Journal of Educational MeasurementTOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF THEORY AND METHOD FOR CRITERION‐REFERENCED TESTS<sup>1,</sup><sup>2</sup>
206 Citations1973Ronald K. Hambleton, Melvin R. Novick
Journal of Educational MeasurementCRITERION‐REFERENCED APPLICATIONS OF CLASSICAL TEST THEORY <sup>1,</sup><sup>2</sup>
175 Citations1972Samuel A. Livingston
Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)MEASUREMENT IN LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION.
158 Citations1970Robert Glaser, Anthony J. Nitko
This approach is the specification of desired instructional goals in terms of organizable domains of human performance criteria as well as adaptation of instruction on an individual basis so that these desired goals are attained by a maximum number of students.
Applied Psychological MeasurementStandard Setting Issues and Methods
105 Citations1980Lorrie A. Shepard
Applied Psychological MeasurementA Comparison of the Nedelsky and Angoff Cutting Score Procedures Using Generalizability Theory
96 Citations1980Robert L. Brennan, Robert E. Lockwood
Review of Educational ResearchPassing Scores and Test Lengths for Domain-Referenced Measures
93 Citations1973Jason Millman
Educational and Psychological MeasurementA Preliminary Investigation of Two Procedures for Setting Examination Standards
65 Citations1976Barbara J. Andrew, James T. Hecht
Applied Psychological MeasurementAgreement Coefficients as Indices of Dependability for Domain-Referenced Tests
62 Citations1980Michael T. Kane, Robert L. Brennan
PsychometrikaSignal/Noise Ratios for Domain-Referenced Tests
33 Citations1977Robert L. Brennan, Michael T. Kane
