Phototherapy in Individuals With and Without Subsyndromal Seasonal Affective Disorder

It is found that bright artificial light did not alter mood and behavior in controls and in contrast, individuals with subsyndromal seasonal affective disorder responded favorably to treatment with bright environmental light.

Abstract

Antidepressant and energizing effects of bright light exposure (phototherapy) have been widely reported to occur in patients with seasonal affective disorder. We have attempted to evaluate whether other segments of the population might benefit from phototherapy, most notably individuals with subsyndromal seasonal affective disorder, as well as healthy individuals with no winter difficulties (controls). We have studied 20 subjects in each of these two categories and have found that bright artificial light did not alter mood and behavior in controls. In contrast, individuals with subsyndromal seasonal affective disorder responded favorably to treatment with bright environmental light. A dose of 5 hours of bright light exposure, divided between morning and evening, was more effective than 2 hours of exposure. This finding may have practical implications for establishing optimal environmental lighting conditions for those individuals whose winter difficulties do not meet criteria for seasonal affective disorder.