On The Use of Variance Designs in Q Methodology
The Psychological RecordPublished 1 April 1970
Steven R. Brown
Citations45
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.52
SNIP0.69
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Misgivings concerning the use of variance design and analysis in the structuring and evaluation of Q samples derive from the basic assumptions of deductive methodologies. Several alternative uses of variance design, as discussed by Stephenson, are suggested. Criticism of Stephenson's use of factorial arrangement is based on a misunderstanding of his position, too strict a reliance on the logical properties of Q samples, and failure to realize the synthetic quality of self-referent statements. Principles are illustrated with empirical examples.
Keywords
Decision SciencesAgricultural and Biological Sciences
American Sociological ReviewThe Play Theory of Mass Communication.
353 Citations1968Melvin L. DeFleur, William Stephenson
The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political ScienceMethodology of the Social Sciences, by Felix Kaufmann (New York, Oxford University Press, pp. x, 272, 1944, $4.25).
39 Citations1945G. Edison
Perceptual and Motor SkillsBibliography on <i>Q</i> Technique and its Methodology
24 Citations1968Steven R. Brown
More than 580 references on Q technique and its methodology are grouped in the following categories: History, Principles, Controversies, and Evaluation.
The Psychological RecordIndependency and operationism in Q-sorting
21 Citations1963William Stephenson
The Psychological RecordOperational study of an occasional paper on the Kennedy-Nixon television debates
7 Citations1964William Stephenson
