login

Global bioethics – myth or reality?

BMC Medical EthicsPublished 11 September 2006Open access
Søren Holm, Bryn Williams–Jones
Citations44
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.08
SNIP1.76
View PDF

TL;DR

Investigating whether there is a 'global bioethics' in the sense of a unified academic community finds that there are geographical and institutional differences in the academic behavior of bioethicists andBioethics institutions.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been debate on whether a global or unified field of bioethics exists. If bioethics is a unified global field, or at the very least a closely shared way of thinking, then we should expect bioethicists to behave the same way in their academic activities anywhere in the world. This paper investigates whether there is a 'global bioethics' in the sense of a unified academic community. METHODS: To address this question, we study the web-linking patterns of bioethics institutions, the citation patterns of bioethics papers and the buying patterns of bioethics books. RESULTS: All three analyses indicate that there are geographical and institutional differences in the academic behavior of bioethicists and bioethics institutions. CONCLUSION: These exploratory studies support the position that there is no unified global field of bioethics. This is a problem if the only reason is parochialism. But these regional differences are probably of less concern if one notices that bioethics comes in many not always mutually understandable dialects.

Keywords

Decision SciencesMedicine