Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication
American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyPublished 1 October 2000
Sascha Dublin, Mona T. Lydon‐Rochelle, Robert C. Kaplan, D. Heather Watts, Cathy W. Critchlow
Citations114
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.77
SNIP2.75
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Among women who lacked an identified indication for induction of labor, induction was associated with increased likelihood of cesarean delivery for nulliparous but not multiparous women and with modest increases in the risk of instrumental delivery and shoulder dystocia for all women.
Abstract
Among women who lacked an identified indication for induction of labor, induction was associated with increased likelihood of cesarean delivery for nulliparous but not multiparous women and with modest increases in the risk of instrumental delivery and shoulder dystocia for all women.
Keywords
Medicine