On the Inadequacy and Inappropriateness of the Replication Standard
PS Political Science & PoliticsPublished 1 September 1995
L. Sandy Maisel
Citations6
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.66
SNIP0.97
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Gary King has done a great service to the discipline in raising the question of how we meet appropriate standards for assuring that our published work advances the collective knowledge concerning government and politics that is in our mutual professional interest. He has done so in a truly collegial manner, stating his view, raising concerns, and inviting discussion. The editors of PS are using this publication in precisely the proper way by providing a forum in which this professional debate can be aired.
Keywords
Social Sciences
American Political Science ReviewThe American Voter. By A. Campbell, P. Converse, W. Miller, and D. Stokes. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1960. Pp. viii, 573. $8.50.)
4,770 Citations1960Heinz Eulau
Political Science QuarterlyHome Style: House Members in Their Districts, <i>by Richard F. Fenno, Jr.</i>
1,629 Citations1979David A. Leuthold
American Economic ReviewReplication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project
492 Citations2016William G. Dewald, Jerry G. Thursby +1 more
American Political Science ReviewIssue Conflict and Consensus among Party Leaders and Followers
395 Citations1960Herbert McClosky, Paul J. Hoffmann +1 more
