Two-stage two-dimensional spatial competition between two firms
Regional Science and Urban EconomicsPublished 1 April 1994
Takatoshi Tabuchi
Citations137
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.92
SNIP1.77
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
In this paper we analyze the Hotelling's model of spatial duopoly on two-dimensional space, where the first stage is the location game, and the second stage is the price game. In the case of a uniform rectangular distribution of consumers, we prove that (i) two firms maximize their distance in one dimension, but minimize their distance in the other dimension, (ii) the firms are better off if they locate sequentially rather than simultaneously, and (iii) the welfare loss in equilibrium is 1.6 to 4 times as large as that in optimum.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and FinanceBusiness, Management and Accounting
Stability in Competition
5,793 Citations1990Harold Hotelling
EconometricaOn Hotelling's "Stability in Competition"
1,889 Citations1979Claude d’Aspremont, Jean J. Gabszewicz +1 more
EconometricaAggregation and Imperfect Competition: On the Existence of Equilibrium
676 Citations1991Andrew Caplin, Barry Nalebuff
The RAND Journal of EconomicsNash Equilibrium in Duopoly with Products Defined by Two Characteristics
72 Citations1986Nicholas Economides
The Review of Economic StudiesNon-existence of Equilibrium for the Two-dimensional Three-firms Location Problem
44 Citations1975Avner Shaked
