Resuscitation Policy Concerning Older Adults: Ethical Considerations of Paternalism Versus Autonomy
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
An examination of physician paternalism versus patient autonomy concerning do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders within the context of utilitarian ethical theory is examined.
Abstract
The heated national debate concerning health care must include a discussion of a patient's wishes and the implications of his or her right to determine individual medical treatment decisions, especially at the end of life. This article is an examination of physician paternalism versus patient autonomy concerning do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders within the context of utilitarian ethical theory. The author proposes effective compromise between the two; consideration of decision making on a case-by-case basis; enhanced education for all actors concerning cardiopulminary resucitation (CPR), DNR, and advanced directives; and consensus reached through democratic debate regarding the allocation of health care resources.
