Welfare loss, redistribution effect, and restriction of output due to monopoly in banking
Journal of Monetary EconomicsPublished 1 January 1982
Stephen A. Rhoades
Citations39
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score7.87
SNIP2.70
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Although several studies have estimated the welfare loss due to monopoly for manufacturing, no such estimate has been made for banking. This study seeks to fill that gap by estimating the deadweight welfare loss, the redistribution effect (total monopoly profits), and restriction of output due to monopoly in banking for 1978. The analysis is based on 6,500 banks and over 2,000 markets. Results indicate that the deadweight welfare loss in banking is very small. However, the redistribution effect (total monopoly profits) and restriction of output in banking is quite large.
Keywords
Business, Management and Accounting
The Journal of FinanceIndustrial Market Structure and Economic Performance.
6,393 Citations1971H. Michael Mann, F. M. Scherer
Monopoly and Resource Allocation
679 Citations1995Arnold C. Harberger
The General Welfare in Relation to Problems of Taxation and of Railway and Utility Rates
632 Citations1990Harold Hotelling
The Economic JournalThe Social Costs of Monopoly Power
249 Citations1978Keith Cowling, Dennis C. Mueller
EconomicaBilateral Monopoly, Successive Monopoly, and Vertical Integration
174 Citations1960Fritz Machlup, Martha V. Taber
Allocative Efficiency, X-Efficiency and the Measurement of Welfare Losses
94 Citations1972William S. Comanor, Harvey Leibenstein
Southern Economic JournalNew Estimates of the Welfare Loss to Monopoly, United States: 1956-1969
58 Citations1973D. A. Worcester
Journal of Financial and Quantitative AnalysisA Reestimation of the Benston-Bell-Murphy Cost Functions for a Larger Sample with Greater Size and Geographic Dispersion
18 Citations1972Neil B. Murphy
