New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: Some powerful and practicable procedures.
Psychological BulletinPublished 1 November 1991
Michael A. Seaman, Joel R. Levin, Ronald C. Serlin
Citations324
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score8.70
SNIP8.94
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Recent developments in procedures for conducting pairwise multiple comparisons of means prompted an empirical investigation of several competing techniques. Monte Carlo results revealed that the newer multistage sequential procedures maintain their familywise Type I error probabilities while exhibiting power that is superior to the traditional competitors. Of all procedures examined, the modified Peritz (1970) procedure (Seaman, Levin, Serlin, & Franke, 1990) is generally the most powerful according to all definitions of power
Keywords
Decision SciencesMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy
Scandinavian Journal of StatisticsA Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
21,827 Citations1979Sture Holm
Choice Reviews OnlineNumerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing
17,989 Citations1993Press, William H, Flannery, Brian P +2 more
American Journal of Physics<i>Numerical Recipes, The Art of Scientific Computing</i>
10,031 Citations1987William H. Press, Brian P. Flannery +3 more
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationMultiple Comparisons among Means
4,477 Citations1961Olive Jean Dunn
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationRectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions
2,272 Citations1967Zbyněk Šidák
Psychological BulletinConsequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
1,054 Citations1975Anthony G. Greenwald
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationModified Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedures
759 Citations1986Juliet Popper Shaffer
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationAn Evaluation of Ten Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures by Monte Carlo Methods
659 Citations1973S. G. Carmer, Mike Swanson
EuphyticaThe use of the „studentized range” in connection with an analysis of variance
631 Citations1952M. Keuls
The method indicated in this article diverges from those discussed by Newman andTukey and is I suppose the more plausible.
The American StatisticianMultiple Comparison Procedures: The Practical Solution
621 Citations1990D. J. Saville
BiometrikaTHE DISTRIBUTION OF RANGE IN SAMPLES FROM A NORMAL POPULATION, EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF AN INDEPENDENT ESTIMATE OF STANDARD DEVIATION
535 Citations1939Deena I.J. Newman
The Annals of Mathematical StatisticsSimultaneous Test Procedures--Some Theory of Multiple Comparisons
372 Citations1969K. R. Gabriel
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationA Study of the Powers of Several Methods of Multiple Comparisons
306 Citations1975Israel Einot, K. R. Gabriel
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationThe Maximum Familywise Error Rate of Fisher's Least Significant Difference Test
270 Citations1986Anthony J. Hayter
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationStepwise Multiple Comparison Procedures
208 Citations1977Roy E. Welsch
Journal of Agronomic EducationPairwise multiple comparisons of treatment means in agronomic research
187 Citations1985S. G. Carmer, W. M. Walker
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationPower Differences between Pairwise Multiple Comparisons
166 Citations1978Philip H. Ramsey
Springer series in cognitive developmentCognitive Learning and Memory in Children
116 Citations1985Michael Pressley, Charles J. Brainerd
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationClosure of the Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparisons Procedure
72 Citations1981Janet M. Begun, K. Ruben Gabriel
Journal of Educational StatisticsComparison of Means: An F Test Followed by a Modified Multiple Range Procedure
43 Citations1979Juliet Popper Shaffer
Springer series in cognitive developmentSome Methodological and Statistical “Bugs” in Research on Children’s Learning
42 Citations1985Joel R. Levin
This chapter provides the opportunity to discuss a number of methodological and statistical “bugs” that I have detected creeping into psychological research in general, and into research on children’s learning in particular.
