Cycle of child sexual abuse: Links between being a victim and becoming a perpetrator
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
The data support the notion of a victim-to-victimiser cycle in a minority of male perpetrators but not among the female victims studied.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is widespread belief in a 'cycle' of child sexual abuse, but little empirical evidence for this belief. AIMS: To identify perpetrators of such abuse who had been victims of paedophilia and/or incest, in order to: ascertain whether subjects who had been victims become perpetrators of such abuse; compare characteristics of those who had and had not been victims; and review psychodynamic ideas thought to underlie the behaviour of perpetrators. METHOD: Retrospective clinical case note review of 843 subjects attending a specialist forensic psychotherapy centre. RESULTS: Among 747 males the risk of being a perpetrator was positively correlated with reported sexual abuse victim experiences. The overall rate of having been a victim was 35% for perpetrators and 11% for non-perpetrators. Of the 96 females, 43% had been victims but only one was a perpetrator. A high percentage of male subjects abused in childhood by a female relative became perpetrators. Having been a victim was a strong predictor of becoming a perpetrator, as was an index of parental loss in childhood. CONCLUSIONS: The data support the notion of a victim-to-victimiser cycle in a minority of male perpetrators but not among the female victims studied. Sexual abuse by a female in childhood may be a risk factor for a cycle of abuse in males.
