The Ethics of Evaluation Researchers

Abstract

This exploratory study examines (1) the values of evaluation research practitioners in response to ethical statements demanding a value choice and (2) the relationship between evaluator value choices and five hypothetical value dimensions relevant to more mature groups of professionals. Preliminary findings indicate that scaling, comparison, and analysis of evaluator value choices are feasible and may identify whatever consensus exists. Value conflicts exist among evaluation practioners, particularly around more esoteric concepts such as sharing and client loyalty versus distributive justice. The implications of multiple value conflictsfor the further growth of evaluation as a profession are discussed.