Team Theory and Distributed Processing: Surprise Attack
Information Systems FrontiersPublished 1 July 1999
Kenneth J. Arrow
Citations3
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.00
SNIP2.48
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
It is shown that the so-called “surprise attack paradox” disappears when approached from a team-theory viewpoint.
Abstract
Abstract It is argued that team theory is the appropriate analytic tool for studying distributed processing. It is shown that the so-called “surprise attack paradox” disappears when approached from a team-theory viewpoint.
Keywords
Computer ScienceDecision SciencesPhysics and Astronomy
Cambridge University Press eBooksThe electronic mail game: Strategic behavior under “almost common knowledge”
542 Citations1992Ariel Rubinstein
This paper addresses a paradoxical game theoretic example which is closely related to the coordinated attack problem and shows that even if a large (but finite) number of propositions of the type "i knows that j knows that i knows... that the game is G" are true, the game theory situation is very different from when the coordination game played is common knowledge.
Elsevier eBooksREASONING ABOUT KNOWLEDGE: AN OVERVIEW
134 Citations1986Joseph Y. Halpern
This overview paper will attempt to identify and describe some of the common threads that tie together work in reasoning about knowledge in such diverse fields as philosophy, economics, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and theoretical computer science.