Collaborative Learning between Peers
Educational Psychology in PracticePublished 1 January 1996
David Wood, Claire O’Malley
Citations98
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.69
SNIP0.90
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Summary Our paper starts with an overview of research into collaborative learning. This demonstrates that collaboration in pairs or small groups can facilitate pupils' learning and development. Yet observations of classroom practice show that group work does not realise the potential promised by research. Explaining this divide between results of research and observation of practice is the major focus of our overview. We then offer some suggestions about how educational psychology might help to bridge the divide.
Keywords
PsychologySocial Sciences
Choice Reviews OnlineApprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context
5,499 Citations1990
Apprenticeship in Thinking
4,581 Citations1990Barbara Rogoff
Oxford Review of EducationVygotsky, Tutoring and Learning
303 Citations1996David Wood, Heather Wood
It is suggested that the principles identified apply mainly to procedural learning in well‐structured domains and that other learning goals, such as the development of skills in self‐regulation, need to be derived from a different model of the learning process.
Medical Entomology and ZoologyTeaching Talk: Strategies for Production and Assessment
213 Citations1985Anne H. Anderson, Gillian Brown +2 more
Group Work in the Primary Classroom
126 Citations2007Maurice Galton
Group Work in the Primary Classroom
118 Citations2003Maurice Galton, John Williamson
Cognition and InstructionOn Becoming a Tutor: Toward an Ontogenetic Model
93 Citations1995David Wood, Heather Wood +2 more
Educational ResearchGender differences and effects of co‐operation in a computer‐based language task
37 Citations1994Geoffrey Underwood, Nishchint Jindal +1 more
Two organizations of pairs were observed ‐ one explicitly instructed to discuss the task and to work co‐operatively, and one in which the children were told that their contribution to the task would be assessed on an individual basis.
