Response Rate Comparisons of E-Mail- and Mail-Distributed Student Evaluations
Teaching and Learning in MedicinePublished 1 April 2000
Anthony M. Paolo, Giulia Bonaminio, Cheryl Gibson, Ty Partridge, Ken Kallail
Citations131
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.95
SNIP1.48
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Although the findings have limited generalizability because of low response rates and small sample sizes, the results suggest caution when using e-mail to collect curriculum evaluations from 4th-year medical students.
Abstract
Although the findings have limited generalizability because of low response rates and small sample sizes, the results suggest caution when using e-mail to collect curriculum evaluations from 4th-year medical students.
Keywords
PsychologySocial Sciences
Public Opinion QuarterlyResponse Effects in the Electronic Survey
567 Citations1986Sara Kiesler, Lee Sproull
An experimental sample survey on health attitudes, behaviors, and personal traits using two forms of administra- tion: electronic and paper mail found closed-end responses in the electronic survey were less socially desirable and tended to be more extreme than were response in the paper survey.
Academy of Management JournalUSING ELECTRONIC MAIL FOR DATA COLLECTION IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH.
229 Citations1986Lee Sproull
Public Opinion QuarterlySelf-Selected and Randomly Selected Respondents in a Computer Network Survey
113 Citations1992John P. Walsh, Sara Kiesler +2 more
Using comparisons of the random sample with the self-selected group, it is sought to understand this motivated responding and the biases entailed.