Little words can make a big difference for text classification
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
This work presents results from text classification experiments that compare relevancy signatures, which use local linguistic context, with corresponding indexing terms that do not, and suggests that stopword lists and stemming algorithms may remove or conflate many words that could be used to create more effective indexing Terms.
Abstract
Most information retrieval systems use stopword lists and stemming algorithms. However, we have found that recognizing singular and plural nouns, verb forms, negation, and prepositions can produce dramatically different text classification results. We present results from text classification experiments that compare relevancy signatures, which use local linguistic context, with corresponding indexing terms that do not. In two different domains, relevancy signatures produced better results than the simple indexing terms. These experiments suggest that stopword lists and stemming algorithms may remove or conflate many words that could be used to create more effective indexing terms.
