Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions.
Journal of Experimental Psychology GeneralPublished 1 December 1990
Daniel J. Weeks, Robert W. Proctor
Citations138
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.08
SNIP1.83
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The present study evaluated whether recent theoretical advances regarding cognitive coding render a translation-based account viable for orthogonal stimulus-response arangements
Keywords
Psychology
Psychological ReviewContingent weighting in judgment and choice.
1,565 Citations1988Amos Tversky, Shmuel Sattath +1 more
Journal of Experimental PsychologyS-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.
1,090 Citations1953Paul M. Fitts, Charles M. Seeger
The present paper reports the results of two experiments designed to demonstrate the utility of the concept of stimulus-response compatibility in the development of a theory of perceptual-motor behavior.
Elsevier eBooksSPACE, TIME, SEMANTICS, AND THE CHILD11The preparation of this paper was supported in part by Public Health Service Grant MH-20021 from the National Institute of Mental Health. I wish to thank Eve V. Clark for her suggestions and comments in the writing of this paper.
1,080 Citations1973Herbert H. Clark
Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective
807 Citations1990Robert W. Proctor, T. Gilmour Reeve
Advances in psychologyThe Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing
771 Citations1990Jessica Simon
This chapter discusses the effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing and the Simon effect with visual displays, which finds that movements to the right are faster when the right command is heard in the right ear than when it is seen in the left ear.
Advances in psychologySpatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility
252 Citations1990Carlo Umiltà, Roberto Nicoletti
This chapter describes the different aspects of the spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility and finds that by combining dimensional overlap with dimensional relevancy, four types of S-R ensembles are obtained.
NeuropsychologiaSpatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time
251 Citations1977Gian Paolo Anzola, G. Bertoloni +2 more
It is concluded that in simple reaction time experiments the difference between ipsilateral and contralateral reactions is due to the elementary anatomical connectivity, and that spatial compatibility becomes important only in choice situations.
Acta PsychologicaWhat is crossed in crossed-hand effects?
153 Citations1986Lucia Riggio, Luiz de Gonzaga Gawryszewski +1 more
Psychological ResearchEgocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility
149 Citations1987Carlo Umilt�, Mario Liotti
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceOn the advance preparation of discrete finger responses.
136 Citations1984T. Gilmour Reeve, Robert W. Proctor
Preparation of finger responses, thus, also appears to be variable, posing problems for Miller's extension of the precuing procedure to the evaluation of discrete versus continuous models of information processing.
British Journal of PsychologySEMANTICS IN THE PERCEPTION OF VERTICALITY
123 Citations1971William G. Chase, Herbert H. Clark
It is proposed that people interpret the words above and below as abstract symbols at a first stage of processing, interpret the pictures above andbelow as abstract symbol at an independent second stage, and compare these two sets of symbols at anindependent third stage.
Acta PsychologicaSpatial relationships and S-R compatibility
116 Citations1972J. Bartlet Brebner, Maxine S. Shephard +1 more
The experimental results point to the need to separate the effects of these three relationships which are typically confounded in studies of spatial compatibility.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceSpatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline.
108 Citations1982Roberto Nicoletti, et al
The results showed that the compatibility effect depends on a correspondence between the spatial codes associated with the locations of the effector and the location of the command stimulus.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceCompatibility effects in the assignment of symbolic stimuli to discrete finger responses.
84 Citations1985Robert W. Proctor, T. Gilmour Reeve
Acta PsychologicaCompatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors
84 Citations1984Roberto Nicoletti, Carlo Umiltà +1 more
Responses are slower when the hand is located in the “wrong” position with respect to the other, whereas the absolute position, that is the side of the body where the respondinghand is located, does not seem to effect the speed of response.
British Journal of PsychologyRESPONSE LATENCIES IN JUDGEMENTS OF SPATIAL LOCATION
80 Citations1969Philip H. K. Seymour
Acta PsychologicaS-R compatibility and changes in RT with practice
65 Citations1973J. Bartlet Brebner
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceCoding left and right.
65 Citations1979William S. Farrell
There was indirect evidence in these experiments that although the spatial codes for up and down are symmetrical, the codes for left and right may be less so; this in turn could account for the greater difficulty of discriminating left from right.
Acta PsychologicaAnatomic and environmental dimensions of stimulus-response compatibility: implication for theories of memory coding
61 Citations1979Stuart T. Klapp, David M. Greim +2 more
Memory & CognitionStroop interference with response, comparison, and encoding stages in a sentence-picture comparison task
42 Citations1974Philip H. K. Seymour
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section AS–R Compatibilities Depend on Eccentricity of Responding Hand
42 Citations1989Claire F. Michaels
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceRole of cerebral hemispheric processing in the visual half-field stimulus-response compatibility effect.
39 Citations1980Bill Cotton, Ovid J. L. Tzeng +1 more
Two experiments were conducted to test theories of the stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility effect, and a visual half-field S-R compatibility effect was obtained, suggesting that an explanation in terms of cerebral laterality factors be considered.
Perception & PsychophysicsWhy are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones?
38 Citations1988Roberto Nicoletti, Carlo Umiltà +2 more
The attentional hypothesis was tested in the present study, which reasoned that because in the auditory modality the above-below discriminations are more difficult than left-right ones, attention should be preferentially allocated to the former.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceMust egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S compatibility effects?
37 Citations1984Elisabetta Làdavas, Morris Moscovitch
The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivationA Triphasic Approach to the Acquisition of Response-Selection Skill
29 Citations1990Robert W. Proctor, T. Gilmour Reeve +1 more
Acta PsychologicaInfluence of handedness on spatial compatibility effects with perpendicular arrangement of stimuli and responses
21 Citations1987Elisabetta Làdavas
Results indicate a preferential association of the dominant hand with upper visual stimuli and the non-dominant hand with lower visual stimuli, and a correspondence between the spatial codes associated with the location of the stimulus and the internal representation of the two hands along the vertical dimension.
Advances in psychologySome Aspects of Spatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility in Adults and Normal Children
18 Citations1990Elisabetta Làdavas
This chapter elaborates some aspects of spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility in adults and normal children and examines the Simon effect, which can be observed in RT tasks for which the position of the stimulus is irrelevant for the selection of the response and yet has an influence on responding speed.
Bulletin of the Psychonomic SocietyA response instruction by visual-field interaction: S-R compatibility effect or?
17 Citations1977Bill Cotton, Ovid J. L. Tzeng +1 more
Advances in psychologyPerceptual-Motor Processing in Speech
7 Citations1990Peter C. Gordon
It is found that if facilitation in the perceptual-motor priming task is because of a shared value on a perceptually salient dimension, then one would expect that stimulus–response pairs with a share manner feature would produce faster reaction times than pairs without a shared manner feature.
Perception & PsychophysicsS-R compatibility effects: Do we need a new theory?
6 Citations1982Stephen J. Lupker, Albert N. Katz
It has been known for many years now that reaction time (RT) to a stimulus is shorter when its relative spatial location corresponds to the relative location of the required response (e.g., Fitts and Seeger, 1953).