Relational Coding Schemes: The Question of Validity
Annals of the International Communication AssociationPublished 1 December 1981
Joseph P. Folger, Marshall Scott Poole
Citations28
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.41
SNIP3.43
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size
Keywords
Computer ScienceMathematicsEngineering
Psychological ReviewTelling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
11,285 Citations1977Richard E. Nisbett, Timothy D. Wilson
Psychological BulletinConstruct validity in psychological tests.
10,874 Citations1955Lee J. Cronbach, Paul E. Meehl
The present interpretation of construct validity is not "official" and deals with some areas where the Committee would probably not be unanimous, but the present writers are solely responsible for this attempt to explain the concept and elaborate its implications.
PsychometrikaAnalysis of Individual Differences in Multidimensional Scaling Via an N-way Generalization of “Eckart-Young” Decomposition
4,716 Citations1970J. Douglas Carroll, Jih-Jie Chang
Introduction to Measurement Theory
1,978 Citations1979Mary J. Allen
Explorations in interpersonal communication
456 Citations1976Gerald R. Miller
Human Communication ResearchANALYSIS OF RELATIONAL COMMUNICATION IN DYADS: NEW MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES
310 Citations1975L. Edna Rogers, Richard V. Farace
Speech MonographsDecision emergence: Phases in group decision‐making
296 Citations1970B. Aubrey Fisher
Sociology of crime, law and devianceCRIMINOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE THOUGHT OF GEORGE HERBERT MEAD
285 Citations2010Ross L. Matsueda
Psychological ReviewLimits on perception of cognitive processes: A reply to Nisbett and Wilson.
276 Citations1978Eliot R. Smith, Frederick D. Miller
American Sociological ReviewConceptions of Interaction and Forms of Sociological Explanation
185 Citations1970Thomas P. Wilson
Journal of CommunicationAn Approach to Communication Theory: Toward Consensus on Rules
144 Citations1972Donald P. Cushman, Gordon C. Whiting
As a discipline, communication should make explication of such rules a central concern, for they knit together into a coherent whole insights from transaction, coorientation, symbolic action, and cybernetics.
Communication Yearbook 30
76 Citations2012Christina S. Beck
Journal of CommunicationCoding Communication at the Relationship Level
66 Citations1971Robert A. Mark
Human Communication ResearchA METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING THE REPRESENTATIONAL VALIDITY OF INTERACTION CODING SYSTEMS: DO WE SEE WHAT THEY SEE?
47 Citations1981Marshall Scott Poole, Joseph P. Folger
Communication MonographsMessage control intensity: Rationale and preliminary findings
24 Citations1980L. Edna Rogers, John A. Courtright +1 more
Speech MonographsAn instrument for assessing content themes in group interaction
11 Citations1975Edward A. Mabry
Social Behavior and Personality An International JournalTHE EFFECTS OF VOCAL PARTICIPATION AND QUESTIONING BEHAVIOR ON PERCEPTIONS OF DOMINANCE
9 Citations1980Joseph P. Folger
Journal of PersonalitySymmetry and asymmetry in interpersonal relations-with implications for the concept of projection1
2 Citations1970Dean Peabody
Evidence for some proposals about interpersonal relations that involve similar or dissimilar characteristics for the two parties is reviewed, and reformulation can provide a simpler and more unified account for cases that are traditionally treated separately as “supplementary’ and “complementary” projection.