Gender-Based Pricing in the Hairdressing Industry
Journal of Consumer PolicyPublished 1 June 2000
Catherine Liston‐Heyes, Elena Neokleous
Citations18
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.60
SNIP1.08
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This paper reviews the evidence and evaluates the claim that the hairdressing industry systematically discriminates on the basis of gender and compares the way in which courts in the UK and US have dealt with such allegations. We argue that "transaction costs" can be used to provide an alternative (perhaps more satisfactory) explanation for the pricing patterns observed than does price discrimination. Any decision to ban gender-based pricing will imply a difficult trade-off between economic efficiency and concerns for gender equality.
Keywords
Social SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
American Economic ReviewRace and Gender Discrimination in Bargaining for a New Car
628 Citations1995Ian Ayres, Peter Siegelman
Deep Blue (University of Michigan)Price Discrimination
105 Citations2013Varian, Hal R., R. Schmalensee +1 more
Economic InquiryA GUIDE TO THE PITFALLS OF IDENTIFYING PRICE DISCRIMINATION
74 Citations1991John R. Lott, Russell D. Roberts
BooksThe Robinson-Patman Act: Federal Regulation of Price Differences
41 Citations1976Richard A. Posner
Applied EconomicsSelf-service activities and formal or informal market services
10 Citations1991Jan C. van Ours
