Epistemic Justice and a Role for Virtue in the Politics of Knowing
MetaphilosophyPublished 1 January 2003
Miranda Fricker
Citations167
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.37
SNIP1.13
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
The dual aim of this article is to reveal and explain a certain phenomenon of epistemic injustice as manifested in testimonial practice, and to arrive at a characterisation of the anti–prejudicial intellectual virtue that is such as to counteract it. This sort of injustice occurs when prejudice on the part of the hearer leads to the speaker receiving less credibility than he or she deserves. It is suggested that where this phenomenon is systematic it constitutes an important form of oppression.
Keywords
Social SciencesArts and Humanities
Princeton University Press eBooks38. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
3,345 Citations2015Alasdair MacIntyre
Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
2,418 Citations1990Sandra Lee Bartky
The Philosophical ReviewTestimony: A Philosophical Study.
547 Citations1995Richard Fumerton, C. A. J. Coady
Cambridge University Press eBooksInternal reasons and the obscurity of blame
431 Citations1995Bernard Williams
Aristotelian Society Supplementary VolumeThe Epistemology of Testimony
315 Citations1987Elizabeth Fricker, David E. Cooper
Against Gullibility
314 Citations1994Elizabeth Fricker
The Politics of Credibility
93 Citations2018Karen Jane Jones
Confidence and Irony
73 Citations2000Miranda Fricker
Epistemic <i>Akrasia</i> and Epistemic Virtue
68 Citations2001Christopher Hookway
