Practice Guidelines and Malpractice Litigation: A Two-Way Street
Annals of Internal MedicinePublished 15 March 1995
Andrew L. Hyams, Jennifer A. Brandenburg, Stuart R. Lipsitz, David W. Shapiro, Troyen A. Brennan
Citations182
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score3.38
SNIP3.27
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
This two-part study reviewed litigation records at two professional liability insurance companies to investigate the use of practice guidelines by plaintiff and defendant attorneys and surveyed attorneys who litigate personal injury cases to assess their views on the role of guidelines.
Abstract
Guidelines are used both by plaintiffs' and defendants' attorneys in malpractice cases. The emphasis in health reform proposals on guidelines as exculpatory evidence should be carefully considered.
Keywords
MedicineHealth ProfessionsEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
