Co-Training and Expansion: Towards Bridging Theory and Practice
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
A much weaker "expansion" assumption on the underlying data distribution is proposed, that is proved to be sufficient for iterative co-training to succeed given appropriately strong PAC-learning algorithms on each feature set, and that to some extent is necessary as well.
Abstract
Co-training is a method for combining labeled and unlabeled data when examples can be thought of as containing two distinct sets of features. It has had a number of practical successes, yet previous theoretical analyses have needed very strong assumptions on the data that are unlikely to be satisfied in practice. In this paper, we propose a much weaker “expansion” assumption on the underlying data distribution, that we prove is sufficient for iterative cotraining to succeed given appropriately strong PAC-learning algorithms on each feature set, and that to some extent is necessary as well. This expansion assumption in fact motivates the iterative nature of the original co-training algorithm, unlike stronger assumptions (such as independence given the label) that allow a simpler one-shot co-training to succeed. We also heuristically analyze the effect on performance of noise in the data. Predicted behavior is qualitatively matched in synthetic experiments on expander graphs.
