CAN SIR BE AS POPULAR AS MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
This issue is studied for one of the recently proposed methods, sliced inverse regression (SIR), and it is shown how to enhance the SIR analysis so that these features of MLR can be maintained.
Abstract
Despite its limitation in exploring nonlinear structures, multiple linear regression (MLR) still retains its popularity among the practitioners. This is mainly because of the several seemingly irreplaceable features of MLR that users are accustomed to, including : (i) it is easy to implement; (ii) it has a solid theoretical foundation; (iii) diagnostic tools are available for model checking; (iv) standard errors are available for significance assessment; (v) output is easy to interpret. Whether such advantages can be maintained or not is an important issue in developing new nonlinear methods for high dimension regression. This issue is studied for one of the recently proposed methods, sliced inverse regression (SIR). We show how to enhance the SIR analysis so that these features can be maintained.
