Phototropism and polarotropism of primary chloronemata of the moss Physcomitrella patens: responses of mutant strains

The phototropic and polarotropic responses of primary chloronemata grown from germinated minated spores of three mutant strains of the moss, Physcomitrella patens, have been studied and compared with those of the wild-type, indicating either that the mutants are impaired in their ability to adopt the positivePhototropic and perpendicular polarotrop responses or that in the mutants the transition between the “low light” (positive phototropic-perpendicular polarotropic) and the �

Abstract

The phototropic and polarotropic responses of primary chloronemata grown from germinated minated spores of three mutant strains of the moss, Physcomitrella patens, have been studied and compared with those of the wild-type. The mutants and wild-type show the same qualitative tropic responses but differ with respect to the light conditions under which they are expressed. In both the wild-type and mutants the responses are controlled by phytochrome. In monochromatic red light, at low fluence rates, wild-type primary chloronemata grow positively phototropically in unidirectional light or perpendicular to the electrical vector (E) in polarised light; at high fluence rates growth in unidirectional light is lateral to the incident light or, in polarised light, parallel to E. The mutants, however, show only the lateral phototropic or parallel polarotropic responses at all fluence rates of red light tested. In far-red light, the wild-type primary chloronemata adopt a positive phototropic or a perpendicular polarotropic response; the mutants show the same responses but in a lower percentage of filaments. These results and those at other wavelengths indicate either that the mutants are impaired in their ability to adopt the positive phototropic and perpendicular polarotropic responses or that in the mutants the transition between the "low light" (positive phototropic-perpendicular polarotropic) and the "high light" (lateral phototropic-parallel polarotropic) responses is shifted to a lower photon fluence rate. Possible explanations of this phenotypic difference are discussed.