Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities
Psychonomic SciencePublished 1 October 1967Open access
Sarah Lichtenstein, J. Robert Newman
Citations303
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
One hundred eighty-eight Ss gave numerical probability estimates for each of 41 probability-related words and phrases. While the responses were reasonably consistent, asymmetry between mirror-image phrases, e.g., quite likely (.79) and quite unlikely (.11), were found. Thus verbal labels on numerical probability response scales may not be practicable.
Keywords
Computer Science
Quarterly Journal of SpeechStability in meanings for quantitative terms: A comparison over 20 years
43 Citations1963Ray H. Simpson
British Journal of Educational PsychologyA QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF MEANING
34 Citations1958John Cohen, E. J. DEARNLEY +1 more
