Verbs, time, and modality
Cognitive SciencePublished 1 April 1977Open access
Mark Steedman
Citations27
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.13
SNIP1.32
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
In the first part of this paper it is argued that Vendler's classification of verbs into aspectual categories, called activities, accomplishments, achievements, and states, is better seen as classifying the meanings of sentences, and a recursive scheme for describing the aspectual character of sentences is presented. In the second part, this scheme is applied to the discussion of the epistemic and deontic meanings of the modal verbs must, will, and may. In particular, the relation between the “future” and “nonfuture” senses of epistemic will is examined.
Keywords
Computer ScienceArts and Humanities
The Concept of Mind
6,842 Citations2006Gilbert Ryle
On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects
1,064 Citations1972Henk J. Verkuyl
The Philosophy of Grammar
973 Citations2013Otto Jespersen
Meaning and the English Verb
930 Citations2014Geoffrey Leech
Acknowledgements Key to Sumbols Preface to Third Edition Introduction 1. Simple Present and Past Tenses 2. Progressive Aspect 3. Expression of Past Time 4. The Expression of Future Time 5. The Primary Modal Auxillaries 6. Modality Continued 7. Indirect Speech.
