Sex‐role stereotyping and gifted girls’ experience and education
Roeper ReviewPublished 1 January 1979
Maija S. Blaubergs
Citations14
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.61
SNIP0.95
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Recent research and literature indicate that many parents, teachers and counselors of the gifted continue to reflect attitudes and sex‐stereotypes that are detrimental to the expression of the abilities of gifted girls.
Keywords
PsychologySocial Sciences
American Journal of OrthopsychiatryThe eye of the beholder: Parents' views on sex of newborns.
368 Citations1974Jeffrey Z. Rubin, Frank J. Provenzano +1 more
Daughters were significantly more likely than sons to be described as little, beautiful, pretty, and cute, and as resembling their mothers, suggesting that sex-typing and sex-role socialization have already begun at birth.
Psychology of Women QuarterlyPersonality Characteristics of Women of Distinction
35 Citations1976Louise M. Bachtold
Sex RolesThe toy salesperson: A voice for change in sex-role stereotypes?
17 Citations1978Nancy G. Kutner, Richard Levinson
Sex RolesThe relationship of sex-role perception and levels of self-actualization in public school teachers
8 Citations1978George W. Wise
Gifted Child QuarterlyA Comparison of Sex Roles of Creative-Productive Versus Non-Productive Women
3 Citations1978Jean A. Morse, Catherine B. Bruch