Case Studies from Two Collaboratives on Diabetes in Washington State
The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and SafetyPublished 1 February 2004
Donna M. Daniel, Jan Norman, Connie L. Davis, Helan Lee, Michael Hindmarsh, David K. McCulloch
Citations14
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
Two individual teams were able to introduce innovations in care and realize improvement in patient outcomes in a small, rural clinic and a larger urban health system.
Abstract
Two individual teams, one from a small, rural clinic and one from a larger urban health system, were able to introduce innovations in care and realize improvement in patient outcomes.
Keywords
Medicine
Health AffairsImproving Chronic Illness Care: Translating Evidence Into Action
3,378 Citations2001Edward H. Wagner, Brian T. Austin +4 more
The CCM is described, its use in intensive quality improvement activities with more than 100 health care organizations, and insights gained in the process are described, to guide quality improvement.
The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and SafetyA State-Level Application of the Chronic Illness Breakthrough Series: Results from Two Collaboratives on Diabetes in Washington State
52 Citations2004Donna M. Daniel, Jan Norman +6 more
The benefits of holding collaboratives more locally include increased technical support and increased participation, translating into wider implementation of prevention-focused, patient-centered care.