The Relative Contribution of Content and Context Factors on the Interpretation of Conditionals
Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)Published 1 July 2002
Kristien Dieussaert, Walter Schaeken, Géry d’Ydewalle
Citations35
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score0.59
SNIP0.71
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Previous research showed that conditional reasoning is affected by the content and the context of the studied problems. In this study, we investigate in detail the relative effect of three factors, namely the number of alternative or disabling reasons, speaker control, and pragmatic type, on the interpretation of conditionals. These factors were subject to prior research, but mostly in a fragmented way. This study indicates that some important nuances must be added to earlier findings. The number of alternatives and disablers, the speaker control, and the pragmatic type of conditional statements all have a considerable effect on how we interpret these sentences and reason with them, but they do not have equal weight. Alternatives/disablers play a significant but very limited role on the interpretation of conditionals, while the influence of speaker control and of pragmatic type is far more imperative.
Keywords
PsychologyDecision SciencesNeuroscience
Language<b>Mental models</b> : Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. By Philip N. Johnson-Laird (Cognitive science series, 6.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983. Pp. 528. $25.00.
4,491 Citations1985Marilyn Ford
This an extraordinarily rich book, providing a coherent account of much recent experimental work in cognitive psychology, along with lucid explanations of relevant theory in linguistics, computer science, and philosophy.
Journal of the American Statistical AssociationClassical and Modern Regression With Applications.
3,716 Citations1988R. Kirk Steinhorst, Raymond H. Myers
Max Planck Institute for Plasma PhysicsPresumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature
2,293 Citations2000Stephen C. Levinson
British Journal of PsychologyREASONING AND A SENSE OF REALITY
512 Citations1972P. N. Johnson‐Laird, Paolo Legrenzi +1 more
Memory & CognitionConditional reasoning and causation
332 Citations1991Denise D. Cummins, Todd Lubart +2 more
Investigation of the relative contributions of syntactic form and content to conditional reasoning found conclusions of arguments based on conditionals with few alternative causes or disabling conditions were found to be more accept-able than conclusions based on those with many.
Memory & CognitionNaive theories and causal deduction
284 Citations1995Denise D. Cummins
A causal analysis is presented in which alternative causes and disabling conditions impact on judgments concerning causal necessity and sufficiency, which in turn determine deductive entailment relations.
Trends in Cognitive SciencesThe probabilistic approach to human reasoning
268 Citations2001Mike Oaksford, Nick Chater
The probabilistic approach to logical reasoning is contrasted with other approaches to explaining rationality, and it is shown how it has been applied to three main areas of logical reasoning: conditional inference, Wason's selection task and syllogistic reasoning.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section ADeduction from Uncertain Premises
225 Citations1995Rosemary J. Stevenson, David E. Over
Memory & CognitionInterpretational factors in conditional reasoning
204 Citations1994Valerie A. Thompson
The results indicated that perceived necessity and sufficiency predicted variability in reasoning performance for four pragmatic relations, for both determinant and indeterminant syntactic forms, and for both a conditional arguments and a truth table evaluation task, as well as when the temporal relationship between the antecedent and consequent events was reversed.
CognitionThe mental model theory of conditional reasoning: critical appraisal and revision
157 Citations1993Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
The theory is critically examined with regard to its ability to account for psychological data, principally with respect to the rate at which people draw the four basic inferences of modus ponens, denial of the antecedent (DA), affirmation of the consequent (AC) and modus tollens (MT).
CognitionThe task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning
107 Citations2000Valerie A. Thompson
Data rule out a simple model of the interplay between interpretation and reasoning in which the interpretation of a statement is driven solely by its content, and instead indicate that the interpretations of conditional relations is task-specific.
Thinking & ReasoningConditional Reasoning with Realistic Material
97 Citations1997Stephen E. Newstead
Psychological ResearchInducements: On the phrasing and logic of conditional promises, threats, and warnings
85 Citations1976Samuel Fillenbaum
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section AA Probabilistic Interpretation of “If-Then”
81 Citations1996In-Mao Liu, King-chung Lo +1 more
CognitionSuppression of valid inferences: syntactic views, mental models, and relative salience
69 Citations1994David Chan, Fook-Kee Chua
The relative salience model proposed in this study emphasized the centrality of the interpretative processes with the critical component being the Relative salience of premises as judged by subjects on the basis of their prior knowledge activated in particular problem situations.
CognitionConditional reasoning with inducements and advice
60 Citations1998Julie Evans
The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that this difference arose from the fact that the speaker of an inducement is normally seen to have control over the consequent event whereas the giver of advice does not.
Thinking & ReasoningSuperordinate principles in reasoning with causal and deontic conditionals
28 Citations2000K. I. Manktelow, Neil Fairley