Family Decision Making on Trial
New England Journal of MedicinePublished 26 April 1990
Bernard Lo, F. Rouse, Laurie Dornbrand
Citations38
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score19.08
SNIP13.47
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
The highest courts in New York State and Missouri have made it more difficult to withhold life-sustaining treatment from incompetent patients, but in the case of Mary O'Connor, the New York court ruled that treatment should be withheld.
Abstract
Two state courts recently have ruled on the issue of who may make\ndecisions about life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients. In
Keywords
MedicineHealth Professions
Annals of Internal MedicineClinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine.
812 Citations1982
Clinical Ethics introduces the four-topics method of approaching ethical problems (i.e., medical indications, patient preferences, quality of life, and contextual features); each of the four chapters represents one of the topics.
New England Journal of MedicineThe Physician's Responsibility toward Hopelessly Ill Patients
438 Citations1989Sidney H. Wanzer, Daniel D. Federman +10 more
The value of a sensitive approach to care is emphasized--one that is adjusted continually to suit the changing needs of the patient as death approaches, and the appropriate and, if necessary, aggressive use of pain-relieving substances is recommended.
Archives of Internal MedicinePatient Attitudes to Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment
319 Citations1986Bernard Lo
Questionnaires were administered to outpatients who might require decisions about life-sustaining treatment and raised reservations about advance directives, which respect patient autonomy.
JAMAWho Defines Futility?
310 Citations1988Stuart J. Youngner
While agreeing with Murphy that CPR is contraindicated in many LTC patients, Youngner rejects his proposal to exclude patients and family members from the decision making process, and to not inform them of the physician's unilateral DNR decision.
New England Journal of MedicineThe Quality of Mercy
304 Citations1982Marcia Angell
The treatment of severe pain in hospitalized patients is regularly and systematically inadequate, and it is generally agreed that most pain, no matter how severe, can be effectively relieved by narcotic analgesics.
New England Journal of MedicineInitiating and Withdrawing Life Support
282 Citations1988John Edward Ruark, T A Raffin
New England Journal of MedicineThe Doctor's Master
261 Citations1984Norman G. Levinsky
It is argued that physicians are required to do everything that they believe may benefit each patient without regard to costs or other societal considerations.
Journal of General Internal MedicineDiscussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation
214 Citations1988Robert H. Shmerling, Susanna E. Bedell +2 more
The majority of elderly outpatients have clearly defined opinions about the application of CPR and wish to discuss them with their physicians, and the majority of patients felt such discussions should take place during periods of health and their views should be part of the medical record.
JAMADeciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Report on the Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions
203 Citations1984Herman S. Wigodsky
The Commission's chairman goes on to state that the cases that involve true ethical difficulties are many fewer than commonly believed and that the perception of difficulties occurs primarily because of misunderstandings about the dictates of law and ethics.
New England Journal of MedicinePreferences of Homosexual Men with AIDS for Life-Sustaining Treatment
168 Citations1986Robert Steinbrook, Bernard Lo +4 more
The acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) raises questions about appropriate care for patients with this incurable and progressive disease.
New England Journal of MedicineBenefit and Cost Analysis in Geriatric Care
167 Citations1984Jerry Avorn
A large number of the questioned patients believe that the use of quantitative methods to guide the allocation of health-care resources should be considered as a waste of time and money.
Journal of General Internal MedicinePlanning with elderly outpatients for contingencies of severe illness
108 Citations1988Thomas E. Finucane, James M. Shumway +2 more
Four important findings emerged: 1) Some emotional uncertainty was created when doctors raised these questions unexpectedly: one patient became visibly upset during the discussion, and three who gave consent to be interviewed afterward said that the discussion had made them wonder about their health.
Harvard Law ReviewLitigating Life and Death
97 Citations1988Nancy K. Rhoden
Professor Rhoden criticizes the two dominant approaches courts have developed--the "subjective" and "objective" tests--and proposes that these standards be abandoned for a legal presumption in favor of family decisionmaking.
New England Journal of MedicineEthical Decisions in Discontinuing Mechanical Ventilation
96 Citations1988Lawrence J. Schneiderman, Roger G. Spragg
In acute illnesses, particularly certain forms of pneumonia associated with impaired blood oxygenation, mechanical ventilation can mean the difference between life and death.
New England Journal of MedicineCardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Aged
95 Citations1984Arnold Wagner
As cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) becomes routine for in-hospital deaths unless it is explicitly countermanded for cause, justification for the procedure is being inspected from many points of view.
New England Journal of MedicineThe Saikewicz Decision: Judges as Physicians
45 Citations1978Arnold S. Relman
It is a fundamental canon of medical ethics that physicians should begin treatment only with the consent of the patient, except in emergencies, when they are expected to take appropriate lifesaving action on the patient's behalf even without consent.
Annals of Internal MedicineThe Case of Claire Conroy: Will Administrative Review Safeguard Incompetent Patients?
25 Citations1986Bernard Lo, LAURIE DORNBRAND
To minimize cumbersome decision-making procedures, physicians should discuss life-sustaining treatment in advance with patients who are still competent, and discussions should be more specific than is now customary.
The Hastings Center ReportLaw and the Life Sciences: The Case of Mary Hier: When Substituted Judgment Becomes Sleight of Hand
16 Citations1984George J. Annas
Whether the best interests of the patient were served is discussed in terms of devaluing the life of the mentally handicapped and discriminating against them under the guise of protecting their rights.
The Hastings Center ReportLaw and the Life Sciences: Quality of Life in the Courts: Earle Spring in Fantasyland
12 Citations1980George J. Annas
American Journal of Law & MedicineMedical Ethics and Personal Doctors: Conflicts Between What we Teach and What we Want
12 Citations1987Robert J. Levine
A physician who is guided by this teaching must be a very caring person, which means to be troubled about the troubles of others, and to care deeply about people.
The Hastings Center ReportAt Law: Precatory Prediction and Mindless Mimicry: The Case of Mary O'Connor
11 Citations1988George J. Annas
In re O'Connor (1988), a New York Court of Appeals decision ordering the artificial feeding of a profoundly incapacitated and demented woman, Annas argues that in denying the substituted judgment of the woman's daughters and the best interests approach, the court requires that patients and their families mimic the choices that physicians and judges would make, violating the personal autonomy and constitutional rights of previously competent patients.
Law Medicine and Health CareNew Jersey's “Granny Doe” Squad: Arguments about Mechanisms for Protection of Vulnerable Patients
3 Citations1989David M. Price, Paul W. Armstrong
A state government official in New Jersey has written to administrators of the state's nursing homes outlining what he understands to be certain implications of the Conroy, Peter and Farrell decisions of the New Jersey Supreme Court, including mandatory reporting to and investigation of virtually all cases of contemplated withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.