login

Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective.

Journal of Educational PsychologyPublished 1 March 2001
Andrew J. Martin, Herbert W. Marsh, Raymond L. Debus
Citations220
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score2.83
SNIP3.14

Abstract

The present study is centrally concerned with self-handicapping and defensive pessimism (comprising defensive expectations and reflectivity), the factors that predict these strategies, and the associations between these strategies and a variety of academic outcomes. Major findings are that task orientation negatively predicts both self-handicapping and defensive expectations and positively predicts reflectivity; uncertain personal control positively predicts defensive expectations, and to a lesser extent, self-handicapping; and an external attributional orientation is positively associated with self-handicapping, and to a lesser extent, defensive expectations. Both self-handicapping and defensive expectations are negatively associated with self-regulation and persistence, whereas reflectivity is positively associated with these outcomes. Students high in self-handicapping received lower end-of-year grades than did students low in self-handicapping and were less likely to be in attendance 1 year later.

Keywords

Psychology