Knowing What They Mean: Or Why is There No Phenomenology in the Sociology of Development?
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksPublished 1 January 1987
Aidan Foster‐Carter
Citations4
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
In the late 1980s, the institutionalisation of 'development' or 'Third World' studies is by now well advanced. The field — one hesitates to say, 'discipline' — has achieved widespread formal recognition: both in its own right, and as a component or sub-field within the familiar more general (or, in a sense, more particular) social science disciplines such as economics, politics, geography, and sociology.
Keywords
Social Sciences
eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)Sociology: Themes and Perspectives
1,347 Citations2000Robert van Krieken, Daphne Habibis +4 more
The Sociology of Development
25 Citations1984Andrew Webster