Reasonable Rationing: international experience of priority setting in health care
Published 1 January 2003
Christopher Ham, Glenn Robert
Citations136
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
International experience of rationing is illustrated with examples from New Zealand, Canada, Norway, and the Netherlands.
Abstract
Introduction International experience of rationing New Zealand Canada United Kingdom Norway The Netherlands Conclusions References Index.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Stability in Competition
5,793 Citations1990Harold Hotelling
The Economic JournalWinners and Losers from Regional Integration Agreements
312 Citations2003Anthony J. Venables
Value in HealthThe Drug Budget Silo Mentality in Europe: An Overview
54 Citations2003L. Garrison, Adrian Towse
This supplement engages some of the leading health economists in Europe to analyze how the policies in their respective health-care systems to control and influence pharmaceutical spending are likely to influence the overall performance of their systems, with respect to both cost control and the production of population health.