Sex in Advertising: A Comparison of 1964 and 1984 Magazine Advertisements
Journal of AdvertisingPublished 1 October 1986
Lawrence C. Soley, Gary Kurzbard
Citations174
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score4.46
SNIP2.89
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Abstract This study presents a content analysis of sexual portrayals in magazine advertisements during 1964 and 1984. The results show that the percentage of ads with sexual content did not increase over the twenty-year period, but that the types of sexual portrayals did; sexual illustrations became more overt; and there was a greater reliance on visual than verbal sex in 1984 than 1964. The study also found that female models are more likely to be portrayed as sexually clad, partially clad or nude than were male models.
Keywords
Social Sciences
Journal of Marketing ResearchA Woman's Place: An Analysis of the Roles Portrayed by Women in Magazine Advertisements
378 Citations1971Alice E. Courtney, Sarah Wernick Lockeretz
Journal of Marketing ResearchA Woman's Place: A Follow-Up Analysis of the Roles Portrayed by Women in Magazine Advertisements
122 Citations1973Louis C. Wagner, Janis B. Banos
Journal of Advertising ResearchHow Sexy Illustrations Affect Brand Recall
121 Citations1969M Steadman
Journal of Marriage and the FamilyChange in Sexual Attitudes and Behavior of College Students from 1965 to 1980: A Research Note
92 Citations1982Ira E. Robinson, Davor Jedlicka
Journal of AdvertisingSubliminal Embeds in Print Advertising: A Challenge to Advertisng Ethics
39 Citations1979Jon Kelly
Journal of AdvertisingSex Differences in Socially Responsible Advertising Decisions
6 Citations1978Stuart H. Surlin
