Whatever happened to shared decision‐making?
Health ExpectationsPublished 1 September 2002Open access
Angela Coulter
Citations31
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.37
SNIP1.46
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
The document went on to promise more information to empower patients, measures to strengthen patients’ choice in the location and timing of treatment, the development of a new patient advocacy service, better practice in seeking informed consent, regular patient feedback surveys, a better complaints system, and patient representation on a whole raft of committees and policy-making bodies.
Abstract
Whatever happened to shared decision-making?
Keywords
Health Professions
Evidence-based Patient Choice
141 Citations2001
Health ExpectationsUser involvement in clinical governance
46 Citations2002Susan Pickard, Martin Marshall +6 more
Drawing on policy and guidance published since 1997, this paper sets out a framework for how users are involved in this agenda, evaluates practice against this standard and suggests why current practice for user involvement in clinical governance is flawed.