Response to Fugard and Potts: supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool
International Journal of Social Research MethodologyPublished 23 February 2015Open access
David Byrne
Citations9
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.81
SNIP3.22
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
This is an interesting and provocative paper but in my view it is not really about thematic analyses. This response was provoked by the paper, and provocation is always a good thing since it leads ...
Keywords
Social Sciences
Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsBasics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
29,422 Citations1992Carolyn Ellis, Anselm Strauss +1 more
Sociological TheoryTheory Construction in Qualitative Research
3,810 Citations2012Stefan Timmermans, Iddo Tavory
Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University)Demystifying Theoretical Sampling in Grounded Theory Research.
202 Citations2009Jenna Breckenridge, Derek Jones
This article has been written in response to the challenges faced by the first author whilst writing a grounded theory proposal, offering some insight into the practicalities of selecting and employing a theoretical sampling strategy.