The Effects of Source and Appeal on Mail Survey Response Patterns
Journal of Marketing ResearchPublished 1 August 1977
Michael J. Houston, John R. Nevin
Citations99
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score6.96
SNIP2.42
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Two major sponsors of consumer mail surveys are universities and commercial research firms. Results of the experiment discussed here suggest that these sponsors should differ in the appeal they include in survey cover letters to elicit the most favorable response patterns.
Keywords
Social Sciences
Journal of Marketing ResearchMail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review
859 Citations1975Leslie Lazar Kanuk, Conrad Berenson
Public Opinion QuarterlyStimulating Responses to Mailed Questionnaires: A Review
401 Citations1975Arnold S. Linsky
Journal of Marketing ResearchMail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review
248 Citations1975Leslie Lazar Kanuk, Conrad Berenson
Social ForcesQuestionnaire Response Rate: A Methodological Analysis
117 Citations1969D. J. Champion, Alan M. Sear
Journal of Marketing ResearchBroadening the Scope of Methodological Research on Mail Surveys
103 Citations1976Michael J. Houston, Neil M. Ford
Journal of Business ResearchAn experimental investigation of mail-survey responses
74 Citations1975Robert A. Peterson
