The Whig interpretation of history
South African Journal of Economic and Management SciencesPublished 31 March 2000Open access
Christopher Torr
Citations559
SJR quartileQ2
SJR score0.35
SNIP0.65
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
In economics, as in other disciplines, one often comes across the term "Whig" or its derivatives. One will find, for example, a particular account being branded as whiggish. Butterfield, who was a historian, introduced the idea of a Whig interpretation of history in 1931. Since then the term has usually been used to classify an approach which views the present as the culmination of a march of progress. This paper provides a brief background to the origin of the term and why Butterfield criticised what he called the Whig interpretation of history.
Keywords
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Whig interpretation of history
1,177 Citations1931Herbert Butterfield
The American Historical ReviewA Liberal Descent: Victorian Historians and the English Past
176 Citations1982Trygve R. Tholfsen, J. W. Burrow
Journal of the History of Economic ThoughtOn the Historiography of Economics
147 Citations1990Mark Blaug
Cambridge University Press eBooksOut of the Closet: A Program for the Whig History of Economic Science
31 Citations2014Steven G. Medema, Anthony M. C. Waterman
Boston studies in the philosophy of scienceOn the Harmful Effects of Excessive Anti-Whiggism
9 Citations1994Aristides Baltas
South African Journal of Economic and Management SciencesSome pair-wise classifications employed in historiography
2 Citations2001Christopher Torr
