Testing for Regret and Disappointment in Choice Under Uncertainty
The Economic JournalPublished 1 January 1987
Graham Loomes, Robert Sugden
Citations299
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score5.37
SNIP2.83
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
Abstract
Much of the experimental evidence concerning violations of von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility theory has been collected fr om experiments designed with conventional theory in mind and does not provide direct tests of alternative models such as regret theory and disappointment theory. This paper reports and discusses recent evidence produced by an exp erimentspe cifically designed to test for the impacts of regret and disappointment, and to indicate their relative importance. Copyright 1987 by Royal Economic Society.
Keywords
Decision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
Cambridge University Press eBooksProspect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
33,002 Citations1988Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky
The Economic JournalRegret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty
4,049 Citations1982Graham Loomes, Robert Sugden
Operations ResearchRegret in Decision Making under Uncertainty
2,991 Citations1982David E. Bell
By explicitly incorporating regret, expected utility theory not only becomes a better descriptive predictor but also may become a more convincing guide for prescribing behavior to decision makers.
Operations ResearchDisappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty
1,293 Citations1985David E. Bell
The implications of disappointment, a psychological reaction caused by comparing the actual outcome of a lottery to one's prior expectations, for decision making under uncertainty, are explored and explicit recognition that decision makers may be paying a premium to avoid potential disappointment is provided.
The Review of Economic StudiesDisappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty
878 Citations1986Graham Loomes, Robert Sugden
Journal of Mathematical PsychologyNontransitive measurable utility
491 Citations1982Peter C. Fishburn
Journal of Economic TheorySome implications of a more general form of regret theory
439 Citations1987Graham Loomes, Robert Sugden
Utility Theory: Axioms Versus ‘Paradoxes’
404 Citations1979Kenneth R. MacCrimmon, Stig Larsson
Towards a Positive Theory of Preferences under Risk
92 Citations1979Ole Hagen
The Importance of What Might Have Been
40 Citations1984Graham Loomes, Robert Sugden
