A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations
International Journal of Intelligent SystemsPublished 18 June 2003
Eulalia Szmidt, Janusz Kacprzyk
Citations254
SJR quartileQ1
SJR score1.14
SNIP1.40
Generate an AI Snapshot to get a quick, structured summary of this paper.
Study Snapshot
ObjectiveStudy objective
MethodsResearch methodology
PopulationPopulation studied
Sample sizeSample sizes
OutcomesStudy outcomes here
ResultsStudy results comes here
LimitationsResearch study limitations comes here
A concise AI-generated summary of the paper will appear here once you click Generate AI Snapshot.
TL;DR
It is shown that intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, that in addition to a membership degree include a hesitation margin, can better reflect the very imprecision of testimonies of the individuals during the consensus‐reaching process.
Abstract
We extend the main idea of a fuzzy analysis of consensus—that is based on a concept of a distance from consensus—to a case when individual testimonies are individual intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, as opposed to fuzzy preference relations commonly used. Intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, that in addition to a membership degree (from [0, 1]) include a hesitation margin (concerning the membership degree), can better reflect the very imprecision of testimonies (expressing preferences) of the individuals during the consensus-reaching process. Our new solution, obtained as an interval-valued measure of a distance from consensus, better reflects both real human perception and a soft nature of consensus. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords
Computer ScienceDecision Sciences
Fuzzy Sets and SystemsIntuitionistic fuzzy sets
16,153 Citations1986Krassimir Atanassov
Various properties are proved, which are connected to the operations and relations over sets, and with modal and topological operators, defined over the set of IFS's.
Studies in fuzziness and soft computingIntuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
1,927 Citations1999Krassimir Atanassov
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications
1,380 Citations1999Krassimir Atanassov
The basic definitions and properties of the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFSs) are introduced in the book and readers will find discussions on some of the IFS extensions (for example, interval-values IFSs, temporal I FSs and others) and applications.
Fuzzy Sets and SystemsA model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments
1,135 Citations1996Francisco Herrera, Enrique Herrera‐Viedma +1 more
This paper presents a consensus model in group decision making under linguistic assessments, based on the use of linguistic preferences to provide individuals' opinions, and on theUse of fuzzy majority of consensus, represented by means of a linguistic quantifier.
Fuzzy Sets and SystemsGroup decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority
690 Citations1986Janusz Kacprzyk
Using the fuzzy majority rule specified by a fuzzy linguistic quantifier, a calculus of linguistically quantified propositions is applied and various solution concepts are derived, mainly of the type of core, minimax (opposition) set and consensus winner.
European Journal of Operational ResearchA ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences
438 Citations1988Janusz Kacprzyk, Mario Fedrizzi
A new measure (degree) of consensus is proposed which is more human-consistent in the sense that it better reflects a real human perception of the essence of consensus in practice.
International series in intelligent technologiesConsensus Under Fuzziness
183 Citations1997Janusz Kacprzyk, Hannu Nurmi +1 more
This work focuses on the development of Fuzzy Consensus Via Neural Modelling, which involves modeling Preference Relations and Consensus in a Linguistic Environment and an approach Based on OWA Operators.
The Economic JournalFuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications to Policy Analysis and Information Systems.
138 Citations1981Myles M. Dryden, Paul P. Wang +1 more
Mathematical Social SciencesA ‘human-consistent’ degree of consensus based on fuzzy login with linguistic quantifiers
118 Citations1989Janusz Kacprzyk, Mario Fedrizzi
A new ‘humanly-consistent’ degree of consensus has been proposed by the authors which is basically meant as a degree to which ‘most of the important individuals agree’ as to almost all the relevant options’.
Information Processing and Management of UncertaintyGroup decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations
96 Citations1998Eulalia Szmidt, Janusz Kacprzyk
The main purpose of the paper is to briefly present how intuitionistic fuzzy sets can be used in a group decision making.
Cybernetics & SystemsGROUP DECISION-MAKING WITH A FUZZY MAJORITY VIA LINGUISTIC QUANTIFIERS. PART I: A CONSENSORY-LIKE POOLING
58 Citations1985Janusz Kacprzyk
In Part II the same problem will be discussed using a competitive-like pooling, and some solution concepts are considered: cores, minimax (opposition) sets, consensus winners, etc.
KybernetesCOALITION ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY SETS
45 Citations1979Bonnie Spillman, James C. Bezdek +1 more
A generalized Tanimoto coefficient measuring attitudinal similarity provides the fundamental basis for location and analysis of potential coalitions in a group decision‐making task.
The Handbooks of fuzzy sets seriesGroup Decision Making Under Fuzziness
39 Citations1998Janusz Kacprzyk, Hannu Nurmi
This paper briefly outlines some basic inconsistencies and negative results of group decision making and social choice, and shows how they can be alleviated by some plausible modifications of underlying assumptions, mainly by introducing fuzzy preference relations and, to a lesser extend, a fuzzy majority.
Health Education MonographsDecision-Making in Small Groups
17 Citations1962Philburn Ratoosh
Dr. Ratoosh has based this paper on an address he gave at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Public Health Educators in San Francisco on October 29, 1960.
Collective choice rules under linguistic preferences: an example of the computing with words/perceptions paradigm
8 Citations2002Janusz Kacprzyk, Sławomir Zadrożny
The approach proposed is an example of the use of the new paradigm of computing with words/perceptions, with a Linguistic OWA operators guided aggregation of preferences employed.